I'll be part of a panel discussion today on campus at 4pm to discuss recent grafitti episodes in dormitories that involved swastikas and other hateful markings on doors of Jewish and African American students. I'm just collecting my thoughts (I'll be jumping in right after classes so it will have to be "not so scripted"). Here are a couple of ideas I've been mulling over:
1. A behavioral analysis of grafitti in general: The critical reinforcing consequence is "being seen" or "heard." So a necessary response is quick removal of offending graffitti so that we remove the reinforcing consequence. In other words, scrub it out fast.
2. Why do some want to be "heard" in this way? I wonder if there is a connection to "disconnection" among men in particular. The majority of college students in the country (reflected in our numbers at Keene as well) are women. Men seem less intellectually engaged, less connected to academics, less likely to succeed. And, I think they know it...destined to a life of less power and money and control. I wonder if their anger about this is reflected in hateful actions? Abuse and denigration of others, abuse of women, abuse of alcohol...a kind of "escape from freedom" as Erich Fromm would say? I fear we are losing men..that they are lost.
3. Anti-intellectualism as a key factor. We are living in an a time of soundbite, quick and hateful responses to complex world problems. On college campuses, we dissect these issues, de-construct and re-construct, analyze, consider alternative ideas...it's a process that takes a long time and is hard work. We see the opposite in the current political debates where "pounding the table" with good "put downs" wins the approval of voters. But as college professors, we are not interested in a quick "pound the table" answer. And here in New Hampshire, we've experienced the largest cutbacks in state contributions to higher education BY FAR in the country. I myself have been called all sorts of names: "educrat," "far out radical," "egg-head," and worse.
4. People with Autism who learn social skills in a step-by-step manner know better than to rely on name calling or negative "one liners" which they call "conversation stoppers." I'm reminded of comedienne Joan Rivers' old line: "Can we talk?" If we can't, we're in big trouble.